<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/nhess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1561-8633</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9981</eissn>
		<volume_number>10</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/nhess-10-89-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/10/89/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/10/89/2010/nhess-10-89-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/10/89/2010/nhess-10-89-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>89</start_page>
	<end_page>95</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-01-14</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Atmospheric correction for satellite remotely sensed data intended for agricultural applications: impact on vegetation indices</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. G. Hadjimitsis</name>
			<email>d.hadjimitsis@cut.ac.cy</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,7">
			<name>G. Papadavid</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Agapiou</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Themistocleous</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. G. Hadjimitsis</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="2">
			<name>A. Retalis</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="3">
			<name>S. Michaelides</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>N. Chrysoulakis</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="5">
			<name>L. Toulios</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="6">
			<name>C. R. I. Clayton</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Cyprus University of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-Remote Sensing Laboratory, Lemesos, Cyprus</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, Athens, Greece</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Meteorological Service, Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas, Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Heraklion, Crete, Greece</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">National Agricultural Research Foundation, Larissa, Greece</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Agricultural Research Institute of Cyprus, 1516, Athalassa, Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Solar radiation reflected by the Earth&apos;s surface to satellite sensors is
modified by its interaction with the atmosphere. The objective of applying an
atmospheric correction is to determine true surface reflectance values and to
retrieve physical parameters of the Earth&apos;s surface, including surface
reflectance, by removing atmospheric effects from satellite images.
Atmospheric correction is arguably the most important part of the
pre-processing of satellite remotely sensed data. Such a correction is
especially important in cases where multi-temporal images are to be compared
and analyzed. For agricultural applications, in which several vegetation
indices are applied for monitoring purposes, multi-temporal images are used.
The integration of vegetation indices from remotely sensed images with other
hydro-meteorological data is widely used for monitoring natural hazards such
as droughts. Indeed, the most important task is to retrieve the true values
of the vegetation status from the satellite-remotely sensed data. Any
omission of considering the effects of the atmosphere when vegetation indices
from satellite images are used, may lead to major discrepancies in the final
outcomes. This paper highlights the importance of considering atmospheric
effects when vegetation indices, such as DVI, NDVI, SAVI, MSAVI and SARVI,
are used (or considered) and presents the results obtained by applying the
darkest-pixel atmospheric correction method on ten Landsat TM/ETM+ images of
Cyprus acquired from July to December 2008. Finally, in this analysis, an
attempt is made to determine evapotranspiration and to examine its dependence
on the consideration of atmospheric effects when multi-temporal image data
are used. It was found that, without applying any atmospheric correction, the
real daily evapotranspiration was less than the one found after applying the
darkest pixel atmospheric correction method.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Akkartal, A., Türüdü, O., and Erbek, F. S.: Analyis of changes in vegetation biomass using multisensor satellite data, Proceedings of the ISPRS Congress-Youth Forum, 181–185, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Bannari, A., Morin, D., Huette, A. R., and Bonn, F.: A review of vegetation indices, Remote Sensing Reviews, 13, 95–120, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Broge, N. H. and Leblanc, E.: Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density, Remote Sens. Environ., 76, 156–172, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Caparrini, F. and Manzella, F.: Hydrometeorological and vegetation indices for the drought monitoring system in Tuscany Region, Italy, Adv. Geosci., 17, 105–110, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Carlson, T. N. and Buffum, M. J.: On estimating total daily evapotranspiration from remote surface temperature measurements, Remote Sens. Environ., 29, 197–207, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Che, N. and Price, J. C.: Survey of Radiometric calibration results and methods for visible and near infrared channels of NOAA-7, -9, and -11 AVHRRs, Remote Sens. Environ., 41, 19–27, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Chrysoulakis, N., Abrams, M., Feidas, H., and Arai, K.: Comparison of atmospheric correction methods using aster data for the area of Crete: the ATMOSAT project, Int. J. Remote Sens., in press, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Courault, D., Seguin, B., and Olioso, A.: Review to estimate Evapotranspiration from remote sensing data: some examples from the simplified relationship to the use of mesoscale atmospheric models, ICID Workshop on Remote Sensing of ET for Large Regions, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Duggin, M. J. and Piwinski, D.: Recorded radiance indices for vegetation monitoring using NOAA AVHRR data; atmospheric and other effects in multitemporal data sets, Appl. Optics, 23, 2620–2623, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> FAO: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Papers~56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Glenn, E. P., Huete, A. R., Nagler, P. L., and Nelson, S. G.: Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: what vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape, Sensors, 8, 2136–2160, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Haboudane, D., Miller, J. R., Pattey, E., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., and Strachan, I. B.: Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agricultural, Remote Sens. Environ., 90, 337–352, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Hadjimitsis, D. G.: Description of a new method for retrieving the aerosol optical thickness from satellite remotely sensed imagery using the maximum contrast value principle and the darkest pixel approach, Transactions in GIS, 12, 633–644, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Hadjimitsis, D. G., Clayton, C. R. I., and Hope, V. S.: An assessment of the effectiveness of atmospheric correction algorithms through the remote sensing of some reservoirs, Int. J. Remote Sens., 25, 3651–3674, 2004a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Hadjimitsis, D. G., Clayton, C. R. I., and Retalis, A.: Darkest pixel atmospheric correction algorithm: a revised procedure for environmental applications of satellite remotely sensed imagery, in: Proceedings 10th International Symposium on Remote Sensing, Proc SPIE~5239, 464~pp, 2004b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Hadjimitsis, D. G., Clayton, C. R. I., and Retalis, A.: The use of selected pseudo-invariant targets for the application of atmospheric correction in multi-temporal studies using satellite remotely sensed imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 11, 192–200, 2009a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Hadjimitsis, D. G., Themistocleous, K., Agapiou, A., and Clayton, C.: Monitoring Archaeological Site Landscapes in Cyprus using Multi-temporal Atmospheric Corrected Image Data, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 7, 121–138, 2009b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Huete, A. R.: A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), Remote Sens. Environ., 25, 295–309, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Jensen, M. E. and Haise, H. R.: Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation, J. Irr. Drain. Div.-ASCE, 89, 15–41, 1963. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Kaufman, Y. J. and Tanré, D.: Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI), IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 30, 261–270, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Liang, Z., Bing-fang, WU, Yue-min, Z., Ji-hua, M., and Ning, Z.: A study of fast estimation of vegetation fraction in Three Gorges emigration area by using SPOT5 imagery, in: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXVII. Part~B8, Beijing, 987–992, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Mather, P. M.: Computer processing of remotely-sensed images. An Introduction, Wiley, Chichester, ISBN~0~471~98550~3, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, Y. H., and Sorroshian, S.: A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index, Remote Sens. Environ., 47, 1–25, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., Deering, D. W., and Harlan, J. C.: Monitoring the vernal advancements and retrogradation (greenwave effect) of nature vegetation, NASA/GSFC Final Report, Greenbelt, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., Seto, K. C., Lenney, M. P., and Macomber, S. A.: Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects?, Remote Sens. Environ., 75, 230–244, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Telesca, L. and Lasaponara, R.: Quantifying intra-annual persistent behaviour in SPOT-VEGETATION NDVI data for Mediterranean ecosystems of southern Italy, Remote Sens. Environ., 101, 95–103, 2006.  </reference>
	</references>
</article>

