<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/nhess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1561-8633</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9981</eissn>
		<volume_number>4</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2004</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/nhess-4-9-2004</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/9/2004/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/9/2004/nhess-4-9-2004.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/9/2004/nhess-4-9-2004.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>9</start_page>
	<end_page>15</end_page>
	<publication_date>2004-03-01</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Retrospective analysis for detecting seismic precursors in groundwater argon content</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. F. Biagi</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. Piccolo</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Minafra</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. Maggipinto</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Castellana</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="2">
			<name>O. Molchanov</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="3">
			<name>A. Ermini</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>V. Capozzi</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="4">
			<name>G. Perna</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="5">
			<name>Y. M. Khatkevich</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="5">
			<name>E. I. Gordeev</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Physics-INFM, University of Bari, Via Amendola 173, 70126 Bari, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">United Institute of the Earth’s Physics, Russian Academy of Science, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya 10, 123995 Moscow, Russia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Department of Physics and Energy Science and Technology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via di Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Department of Biomedical Sciences-INFM, University of Foggia, Via L. Pinto, 71100 Foggia, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Experimental and Methodical Seismological Department, Geophysical Service, Russian Academy of Science, Pijp Av. 9, 683006 Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We examined the groundwater Argon content data sampled from 1988 to 2001 at two wells in
Kamchatka (Russia) and anomalous increases appeared clearly during June-July&amp;nbsp;1996. On
21&amp;nbsp;June, a shallow (1km) earthquake with &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;=7.1 occurred at a distance less than
250km from the wells and so the previous increases could be related to this earthquake
and, in particular, could be considered premonitory anomalies. In order to support
this raw interpretation, we analysed the data collected in details. At first we
smoothed out the high frequency fluctuations arising from the errors in a single
measurement. Next we considered the known external effects on the water of a well that
are the slow tectonic re-adjustment processes, the meteorology and the gravity tides
and we separated these effects applying band-pass filters to the Argon content raw
trends. Then we identified the largest fluctuations in these trends applying the
3 σ criterion and we found three anomalies in a case and two anomalies in other
case. Comparing the time occurrence of the anomalies at the two wells we found out
that a coincidence exists only in the case of the premonitory anomalies we are studying.
The simultaneous appearance of well definite anomalies in the residual trends of the same
parameter at two different sites supports their meaning and the possibility that they are
related to some large scale effect, as the occurrence of a strong earthquake. But, other
earthquakes similar to the June&amp;nbsp;1996 event took place during the Argon content
measurements time and no anomaly appeared in this content. In the past, some of the
authors of this paper studied the Helium content data collected in three natural
springs of the Caucasus during seven years. A very similar result, that is the
simultaneous appearance of clear premonitory anomalies only on the occasion of a strong
(&lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;=7.0) but shallow (2–4km) earthquake, was obtained. The correspondence with the
case of the Caucasus validates the interpretation of the Kamchatkian anomalies
as precursors.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

