<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/nhess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1561-8633</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9981</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/nhess-6-629-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/6/629/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/6/629/2006/nhess-6-629-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/6/629/2006/nhess-6-629-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>629</start_page>
	<end_page>635</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-07-14</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">A neural network model for short term river flow prediction</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. Teschl</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>W. L. Randeu</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Graz University of Technology, Department of Broadband Communications, Graz, Austria</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">This paper presents a model using rain gauge and weather radar data to
predict the runoff of a small alpine catchment in Austria. The gapless
spatial coverage of the radar is important to detect small convective shower
cells, but managing such a huge amount of data is a demanding task for an
artificial neural network. The method described here uses statistical
analysis to reduce the amount of data and find an appropriate input vector.
Based on this analysis, radar measurements (pixels) representing areas
requiring approximately the same time to dewater are grouped.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Adeloye, A. J. and De Munari, A.: Artificial neural network based generalized storage&amp;ndash;yield&amp;ndash;reliability models using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, J. Hydrol., 326(1&amp;ndash;4), 215&amp;ndash;230, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Aliev, R., Bonfig, K. W., and Aliew, F.: Soft Computing: Eine grundlegende Einführung, Verlag Technik, Berlin, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Blöschl, G., Merz, R., and Piock-Ellena, U.: Flash-Flood Risk Assessment under the Impacts of Land Use Changes and River Engineering Works, Final Report, Institute of Hydraulics, Hydrol. Water Resour. Manage., Vienna University of Technology, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Coulibaly, P. and Baldwin, C. K.: Nonstationary hydrological time series forecasting using nonlinear dynamic methods, J. Hydrol., 307, 164&amp;ndash;174, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Demuth, H. and Beale, M.: MATLAB Neural Networks Toolbox &amp;ndash; User&apos;s Guide, Fifth Printing &amp;ndash; Version 3, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Hsu, K., Vijai Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S.: Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process, Water Resour. Res., 31(10), 2517&amp;ndash;2530, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Imrie, C. E., Durucan, S., and Korre, A.: River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalisation beyond the calibration range, J. Hydrol., 233, 138&amp;ndash;153, 2000.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Kim, G. and Barros, A. P.: Quantitative flood forecasting using multisensor data and neural networks, J. Hydrol., 246, 45&amp;ndash;62, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models I: A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282&amp;ndash;290, 1970. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Pan, T.-Y. and Wang, R.-Y.: State space neural networks for short term rainfall-runoff forecasting, J. Hydrol., 297, 34&amp;ndash;50, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Solomatine, D. P. and Dulal, K. N.: Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall&amp;ndash;runoff modelling, Hydrological Sciences &amp;ndash; Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques, 48, 399&amp;ndash;411, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Sudheer, K. P., Gosain, A. K., and Ramasastri, K. S.: A data driven algorithm for constructing ANN based rainfall-runoff models, Hydrol. Processes, 16, 1325&amp;ndash;1330, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Smith, P. L. (Chairman), Atlas, D., Bluestein, H. B., Chandrasekar, N. V., et al.: Weather Radar Technology Beyond NEXRAD, Committee on Weather Radar Technology Beyond NEXRAD, National Research Council, ISBN: 0-309-08466-0, 96 pages, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Teschl, R. and Randeu, W. L.: An Artificial Neural Network-based Rainfall-Runoff Model using gridded Radar Data. Third European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology (ERAD), Visby, Island of Gotland, Sweden, Paper nr.: ERAD3-A-00163, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Toth, E., Brath, A., and Montanari, A.: Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting, J. Hydrol., 239, 132&amp;ndash;147, 2000. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

