<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/nhess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1561-8633</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9981</eissn>
		<volume_number>8</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/nhess-8-707-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/707/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/707/2008/nhess-8-707-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/707/2008/nhess-8-707-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>707</start_page>
	<end_page>719</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-07-17</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Categorizing natural disaster damage assessment using satellite-based geospatial techniques</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. W. Myint</name>
			<email>soe.myint@asu.edu</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. Yuan</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="3">
			<name>R. S. Cerveny</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="4">
			<name>C. Giri</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">School of Geographical Sciences, Arizona State University 600 E. Orange St. SCOB Bldg Rm 330, Tempe,\newline AZ 85287-0104, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Department of Geography, University of Oklahoma 100 East Boyd St., Norman, OK 73019, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">School of Geographical Sciences, Arizona State University 600 E. Orange St. SCOB Bldg Rm 330, Tempe,\newline AZ 85287-0104, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) Contractor USGS Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS), Sioux Falls, SD, 57198, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Remote sensing of a natural disaster&apos;s damage offers an exciting backup
and/or alternative to traditional means of on-site damage assessment.
Although necessary for complete assessment of damage areas, ground-based
damage surveys conducted in the aftermath of natural hazard passage can
sometimes be potentially complicated due to on-site difficulties (e.g.,
interaction with various authorities and emergency services) and hazards
(e.g., downed power lines, gas lines, etc.), the need for rapid mobilization
(particularly for remote locations), and the increasing cost of rapid
physical transportation of manpower and equipment. Satellite image analysis,
because of its global ubiquity, its ability for repeated independent
analysis, and, as we demonstrate here, its ability to verify on-site damage
assessment provides an interesting new perspective and investigative aide to
researchers. Using one of the strongest tornado events in US history, the
3 May 1999 Oklahoma City Tornado, as a case example, we digitized the
tornado damage path and co-registered the damage path using pre- and
post-Landsat Thematic Mapper image data to perform a damage assessment. We
employed several geospatial approaches, specifically the Getis index,
Geary&apos;s &lt;i&gt;C&lt;/i&gt;, and two lacunarity approaches to categorize damage characteristics according to the original Fujita tornado damage scale
(F-scale). Our results
indicate strong relationships between spatial indices computed within a
local window and tornado F-scale damage categories identified through the
ground survey. Consequently, linear regression models, even incorporating
just a single band, appear effective in identifying F-scale damage
categories using satellite imagery. This study demonstrates that
satellite-based geospatial techniques can effectively add spatial
perspectives to natural disaster damages, and in particular for this case
study, tornado damages.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text">Arciniegas, G. A., Biker, W., Kerle, N., and Tolpekin, V. A.: Coherence- and amplitude-based analysis of seismogenic damge in Bam, Iran, using ASAR data, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1571–1581, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text">Bach, J., Pascual, R., Rigo, T., Pineda, N., López, J. M., Ar\&apos;us, J. and Gayà, M.: An observation study of the 7 September 2005 Barcelona tornado outbreak, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 129–139, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text">Barnes, C. F., Fritz, H., and Jeseon, Y.: Hurricane disaster assessments with image-driven data mining in high-resolution satellite imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1631–1640, 2007 </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text">Bentley, M. L., Mote, T. L., and Thebpanya, P: Using Landsat to identify thunderstorm damage in agricultural regions, Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 83, 363–376, 2002 </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text">Bovolo, F. and Bruzzone, L.: A split-based approach to unsupervised change detection in large-size multitemporal images: Application to tsunami-damage assessment, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1658–1670, 2007 </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text">Bunting, W. F. and Smith, B. E.: A guide for conducting damage surveys, NOAA Tech. Memo, NWS SR-146, 44 pp. [NTIS Accession No. PB93-148427INZ], 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text">Allain, C. and Cloitre, M.: Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets, Physics Review, A, 44, 552–3558, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text">Cerveny, R. S., Lawrimore, J., Edwards, R., and Landsea, C.: Extreme Weather Records: Compilation, Adjudication and Publication, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 853–860, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text">Chaabane, F., Avallone, A., Tupin, F., Briole, P., and Maitre, H: A multitemporal method for correction of tropospheric effects in differential SAR Interferometry: Application to the Gulf of Corinth earthquake, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1605–1615, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text">Chavez, P. S.: Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections – Revisited and Improved, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 1025–1036, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text">Dong, P.: Lacunarity for spatial heterogeneity measurement in GIS, Geographic Information Sciences, 6(1), 20–26, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text">Doswell, III, C. A.: Societal impacts of severe thunderstorms and tornadoes: lessons learned and implications for Europe, Atmos. Res., 67–8, 135–152, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text">Doswell III, C. A. and Burgess, D. W.: On some issues of United States tornado climatology, Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 495–501, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text">Dyer, R. C.: Remote sensing identification of tornado tracks in Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1429–1435, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text">Edwards, R., Corfidi, S. F., Thompson, R. L., Evans, J. S., Craven, J. P., Racy, J. P., McCarthy, D. W. and Vescio, M. D.: Storm Prediction Center forecasting issues related to the 3 May 1999 tornado outbreak, Weather and Forecasting, 17, 544–558, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text">Fujita, T. T.: Proposed characterization of tornadoes and hurricanes by area and intensity, SMRP Research Rep. 91, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL., 15 pp., 1971. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text">Fujita, T. T.: Experimental classification of tornadoes in FPP scale, SMRP Research Rep. 98, University of Chicago, Chicago IL., 15 pp., 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text">Fujita, T. T.: Tornadoes and downbursts in the context of generalized planetary scales, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1511–1534, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text">Fujita, T. T. and Smith, B. E.: Aerial survey and photography of tornado and microburst damage. The Tornado: Its Structure, Prediction and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr. No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 479–493, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text">Getis, A. and Ord, J. K.: The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics, Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 1269–1277, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text">Jedlovec, G. J., Nair, U. and Haines, S. L.: Detection of storm damage tracks with EOS data, Weather and Forecasting, 21, 249–267, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text">Marshall, T. P.: Tornado damage survey at Moore, Oklahoma, Weather and Forecasting, 17, 582–598, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text">McDonald, J. and Mehta K.C.: A Recommendation for an Enhanced Fujita Scale (EF-Scale), Lubbock, Texas: Wind Science and Engineering Research Center, http://www.wind.ttu.edu/EFScale.pdf, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text">Myint, S. W. and Lam, N. S. N.: Examining Lacunarity A.pproaches in Comparison with Fractal and Spatial Autocorrelation Techniques for Urban Mapping, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71, 927–937, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text">Myint, S. W., Mesev, V., and Lam, N. S. N.: Texture Analysis and Classification Through A Modified Lacunarity Analysis Based on Differential Box Counting Method, Geographical Analysis, 38(2006), 371–390, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text">Myint, S. W. and Wang, L.: Multi-criteria Decision Approach for Land Use Land Cover Change Using Markov Chain Analysis and Cellular Automata Approach, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 32, 390–404, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text">Myint, S. W., Wentz, E., and Purkis, S.: Employing spatial metrics in urban land use/land cover mapping: comparing the Getis and Geary indices, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 73(21), 1403–1415, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text">Oosterom, P. J. M., Zlatanova S. and Fendel, E. M.: International Symposium on Geo-Information for Disaster Management, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1434, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text">Ord, J. and Getis, A.: Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application, Geographical Analysis, 27, 286–306, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text">Reese, S., Cousins, W. J., Power, W. L., Palmer, N. G., Tejakusuma, I. G., and Nugrahadi, S.: Tsunami vulnerability of buildings and people in South Java – field observations after the July 2006 Java tsunami, Nat. Haz. Earth Sys. Sci., 7, 573–589, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text">Inoue S., Wijeyewickrema, A. C., Matsumoto, H., Miura, H., Gunaratna, P., Madurapperuma, M., and Sekiguchi, T.: Field survey of tsunami effects in Sri Lanka due to the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26~December~2004, Pure Appl. Geophys, 164, 395–411, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text">Sertel, E., Kaya, S. and Curran, P. J.: Use of semivariograms to identify earthquake damage in an urban area, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1590–1594, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text">Smith III, T.J. and Robblee, M. B.: Mangroves, hurricanes and lightning strikes, Bioscience, 44, 256–263, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text">Speheger D. A., Doswell III, C. A., and Stumpt, G. J.: The tornadoes of 3 May 1999: Event verification in central Oklahoma and related issues, Wea. Forecasting, 17, 362–381, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text">Simpson, R. H.: The hurricane disaster potential scale, Weatherwise, 27, 169, 186, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text">Yuan, D., Elvidge, C. D. and Lunetta, R.: Survey of multispectral methods for land cover change analysis. In Remote Sensing Change Detection, Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications, Edited by R. Lunetta, and C.D. Elvidge, (Ann Arbor press, Michigan), 1–19, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text">Yuan, M., Dickens-Micozzi, M., and Magsig, M. A.: Analysis of tornado damage tracks from the 3 May tornado outbreak using multispectral satellite imagery, Weather and Forecasting, 17(3), 382–398, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text">Zlatanova, S. and Li, J.: Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response (ISPRS book series, number 6), Taylor and Frances Group, London, 381, 2008. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

