<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/nhess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1561-8633</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9981</eissn>
		<volume_number>8</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/nhess-8-805-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/805/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/805/2008/nhess-8-805-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/805/2008/nhess-8-805-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>805</start_page>
	<end_page>812</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-08-05</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Rockfall induced seismic signals: case study in Montserrat, Catalonia</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>I. Vilajosana</name>
			<email>vilajosana@ub.edu</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>E. Suriñach</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Abellán</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Khazaradze</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. Garcia</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>J. Llosa</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Grup d&apos;Allaus (RISKNAT), Dept. Geodinàmica i Geofísica, Fac. de Geologia,  Universitat de Barcelona, C/Martí i Franquès s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute Tecnologia, Av. del Canal Olímpic s/n, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">After a rockfall event, a usual post event survey includes qualitative volume estimation,
trajectory mapping and determination of departing zones. However, quantitative measurements
are not usually made. Additional relevant quantitative information could be useful in
determining the spatial occurrence of rockfall events and help us in quantifying their
size. Seismic measurements could be suitable for detection purposes since they are non
invasive methods and are relatively inexpensive. Moreover, seismic techniques could provide
important information on rockfall size and location of impacts.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
On 14 February 2007 the Avalanche Group of the University of Barcelona obtained the seismic
data generated by an artificially triggered rockfall event at the Montserrat massif (near
Barcelona, Spain) carried out in order to purge a slope. Two 3 component seismic stations
were deployed in the area about 200 m from the explosion point that triggered the rockfall.
Seismic signals and video images were simultaneously obtained. The initial volume of the
rockfall was estimated to be 75 m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt; by laser scanner data analysis. After the explosion,
dozens of boulders ranging from 10&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;4&lt;/sup&gt; to 5 m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt; in volume impacted on the ground
at different locations. The blocks fell down onto a terrace, 120 m below the release zone.
The impact generated a small continuous mass movement composed of a mixture of rocks, sand
and dust that ran down the slope and impacted on the road 60 m below. Time, time-frequency
evolution and particle motion analysis of the seismic records and seismic energy estimation
were performed. The results are as follows:
1 – A rockfall event generates seismic signals with specific characteristics in the time domain;
2 – the seismic signals generated by the mass movement show a time-frequency evolution
different from that of other seismogenic sources (e.g. earthquakes, explosions or a
single rock impact). This feature could be used for detection purposes;
3 – particle motion plot analysis shows that the procedure to locate the rock impact
using two stations is feasible;
4 – The feasibility and validity of seismic methods for the detection of rockfall
events, their localization and size determination are comfirmed.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Abellán, A., Vilaplana, J. M., and Mart\&apos;inez, J.: Application of a long-range Terrestrial Laser Scanner to a detailed rockfall study at Vall de N\&apos;uria (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain), Eng. Geol, 88(3–4), 136–148, 2006.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Deparis, J.:Étude des éboulements rocheux par méthodes géophysiques, Ph. D., Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, p. 247, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Jurkevics, A.: Polarization analysis of three-component array data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 785, 1725–1743. 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Norris, R. D.: Seismicity of rockfalls and avalanches at three Cascade Range volcanoes; implications for seismic detection of hazardous mass movements, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 1925–1939, 1994.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Richart, F. E., Wood, R. D., and Hall, J. R.: Vibration of soils and foundations, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA, p. 414, 1970. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Sabot, F., Naaim, M., Granada, F., Surinach, E., Planet, P., and Furdada, G.: Study of the Avalanche Dynamics by means of Seismic Methods, Image Processing Techniques and Numerical Models, Ann. Glaciol., 26, 319–323, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Suriñach, E.: Spanish avalanche research: experimental sites and seismic measurements Recherches espagnoles dans le domaine des avalanches: sites expérimentaux et mesures sismiques, International Seminar on Snow and Avalanches Test Sites, 173–183, Grenoble 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Suriñach, E., Vilajosana, I., Khazaradze, G., Biescas, B., Furdada, G., and Vilaplana, J. M.: Seismic detection and characterization of landslides and other mass movements, Nat. Haz. Earth Sci., 5, 791–798, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Tatham, R. H. and McCormack, M. D.: Multicomponent seismology in petroleum exploration, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p. 248, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Vidale, J. E.: Complex polarization analysis of particle motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 76(5), 1393–1405, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Vilajosana I., Bacher, M., Suriñach, M., Hübl H., Khazaradze, G., and Garcia de Yebenes L.: Mud flow detection experiments at Schesatobel, Austria, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 9, 07765, 2007 SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU2007-A-07765, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Xia J., Miller, R. D., Park, C. B., and Tian, G.: Determining Q of near-surface materials from Rayleigh waves, J. Appl. Geophys., 51(2), 121–129, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Zywicki, D. J. and Rix, G. J.: Frequency-Wavenumber Analysis of Passive Surface Waves, The Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Conference Proceedings, 14–18 March 1999, Oakland, California, USA, 75–84, 1999. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

