Natural Hazards and Earth System Science www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net 1561-8633 1684-9981 8 4 2008 10.5194/nhess-8-819-2008 http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/819/2008/ http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/819/2008/nhess-8-819-2008.html http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/819/2008/nhess-8-819-2008.pdf 819 838 2008-08-05 A hydrometeorological model intercomparison as a tool to quantify the forecast uncertainty in a medium size basin A. Amengual T. Diomede C. Marsigli A. Martín A. Morgillo R. Romero P. Papetti S. Alonso Grup de Meteorologia, Departament de Física, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain ARPA-SIM Servizio IdroMeteorologico dell'Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy Centro Interuniversitario di Ricerca in Monitoraggio Ambientale (CIMA), Università degli studi di Genova e della Basilicata, Savona, Italy In the framework of AMPHORE, an INTERREG III B EU project devoted to the hydrometeorological modeling study of heavy precipitation episodes resulting in flood events and the improvement of the operational hydrometeorological forecasts for the prediction and prevention of flood risks in the Western Mediterranean area, a hydrometeorological model intercomparison has been carried out, in order to estimate the uncertainties associated with the discharge predictions. The analysis is performed for an intense precipitation event selected as a case study within the project, which affected northern Italy and caused a flood event in the upper Reno river basin, a medium size catchment in the Emilia-Romagna Region. <br><br> Two different hydrological models have been implemented over the basin: HEC-HMS and TOPKAPI which are driven in two ways. Firstly, stream-flow simulations obtained by using precipitation observations as input data are evaluated, in order to be aware of the performance of the two hydrological models. Secondly, the rainfall-runoff models have been forced with rainfall forecast fields provided by mesoscale atmospheric model simulations in order to evaluate the reliability of the discharge forecasts resulting by the one-way coupling. The quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) are provided by the numerical mesoscale models COSMO and MM5. <br><br> Furthermore, different configurations of COSMO and MM5 have been adopted, trying to improve the description of the phenomena determining the precipitation amounts. In particular, the impacts of using different initial and boundary conditions, different mesoscale models and of increasing the horizontal model resolutions are investigated. The accuracy of QPFs is assessed in a threefold procedure. First, these are checked against the observed spatial rainfall accumulations over northern Italy. Second, the spatial and temporal simulated distributions are also examined over the catchment of interest. And finally, the discharge simulations resulting from the one-way coupling with HEC-HMS and TOPKAPI are evaluated against the rain-gauge driven simulated flows, thus employing the hydrological models as a validation tool. <br><br> The different scenarios of the simulated river flows – provided by an independent implementation of the two hydrological models each one forced with both COSMO and MM5 – enable a quantification of the uncertainties of the precipitation outputs, and therefore, of the discharge simulations. <br><br> Results permit to highlight some hydrological and meteorological modeling factors which could help to enhance the hydrometeorological modeling of such hazardous events. Main conclusions are: (1) deficiencies in precipitation forecasts have a major impact on flood forecasts; (2) large-scale shift errors in precipitation patterns are not improved by only enhancing the mesoscale model resolution; and (3) weak differences in flood forecasting performance are found by using either a distributed continuous or a semi-distributed event-based hydrological model for this catchment. Amengual, A., Romero, R., Gómez, M., Mart\'in, A., and Alonso, S.: A hydrometeorological modeling study of a flash-flood event over Catalonia, Spain, J. Hydrometeor., 8, 282–303, 2007. Anquetin, S., Yates, E., Ducrocq, V., and Coauthors: The 8 and 9 September 2002 flash flood event in France: a model intercomparison, Nat. Haz. Earth Sys. Sci., 5, 741–754, 2005. Antolik, M. S.: An overview of the National Weather Service's centralized statistical quantitative precipitation forecast, J. Hydrol., 239, 306–337, 2000. Atkinson, S., Woods, R. A., and Sivapalan, M.: Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing time scales, Water Res. Research, 38(12), 50.1–50.17, 1314, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001487, 2002. Atkinson, S., Sivapalan, M., Woods, R. A., and Viney, N. R.: Dominant physical controls of hourly streamflow predictions and an examination of the role of spatial variability: Mahurangi catchment, New Zealand, Adv. Water Res., 26(3), 219–235, 2003. Bacchi, B., Buzzi, A., Grossi, G., and Ranzi, R.: Flood forecasting in a midsize catchment in the southern Alps: Recent experiences on the use of couple meteorological and hydrological model, Proceedings of the third EGS Plinius conference, Baja Sardinia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma, Italy, 201–208, 2002. Bacchi, B. and Ranzi, R.: Hydrological and meteorological aspects of floods in the Alps: an overview, Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci., 7, 785–798, 2003. Benjamin, S. G. and Seaman, N. L.: A simple scheme for improved objective analysis in curved flow, Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 1184–1198, 1985. Benoit, R., Pellerin, P., Kouwen, N., Ritchie, H., Donaldson, N., Joe, P., and Soulis, E.: Toward the use of coupled atmospheric and hydrologic models at regional scale, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1681–1706, 2000. Benoit, R., Kouwen, N., Yu, W., Chamberland, S., and Pellerin, P.: Hydrometeorological aspects of the Real-Time Ultrafinescale Forecast Support during the Special Observing Period of the MAP, Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci., 7, 877–889, 2003. Bhagarva, M. and Danard, M.: Application of optimum interpolation to the analysis of precipitation in complex terrain, J. Appl. Meteor., 33, 508–518, 1994. Blackadar, A. K.: High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer, Adv. Environ. Sci. Eng., 1, 50–85, 1979. Butts, M. B.: Coupling of catchment modelling and meteorological information in flow forecasting, PIK Report no. 65, Proc. of European Conf. on advances in flood research, edited by: Bronsert, A., Bismuth, C., and Menzel, C., Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung, 476–487, 2000. Butts, M. B., Payne, J. T., Kristensen, M., and Madsen, H.: An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 298, 242–266, 2004. Chancibault, K., Anquetin, S., Ducrocq, V., and Saulnier, G.-M.: Hydrological evaluation of high-resolution precipitation forecast of the Gard flash-flood event (8–9 September 2002), Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 1091–1117, 2006. Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W.: Applied Hydrolology, McGraw-Hill, 572 pp., 1988. Clark, M. P. and Hay, L. E.: Use of medium-range numerical weather prediction model output to produce forecasts of stream-flow, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 243–262, 2004. Deidda, R., Benzi, R., and Siccardi, F.: Multifractal modelling of anomalous scaling laws in rainfall, Water Resour. Res., 35, 1853–1867, 1999. Deidda, R.: Rainfall downscaling in a space-time multifractal framework, Water Resour. Res., 36, 1779–1794, 2000. Diomede, T., Marsigli, C., Nerozzi, F., Papetti, P., and Paccagnella, T.: Coupling high resolution precipitation forecasts and discharge predictions to evaluate the impact of spatial uncertainty in NWP model output, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., (in press), 2008 . Ducrocq, V., Lebeaupin, C., Thouvenin, T., and Anquetin, S.: Mesoscale modelling of a cooding storm, Application to the extreme flood of Gard, 5th EGS Plinius conference, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, 2003. Dudhia, J.: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 1493–1513, 1993. Elementi, M., Marsigli, C., and Paccagnella, T.: High resolution forecast of heavy precipitation with Lokal Modell: analysis of two case studies in the Alpine area, Nat. Hazard Earth Sys. Sci., 5, 593–602, 2005. Farmer, D., Sivapalan, M., and Jothityangkoon, C.: Climate, soil and vegetation controls upon the variability of water balance in temperate and semi-arid landscapes: downward approach to hydrological prediction, Water Res. Research., 39(2), 1035, doi:10.1029/2001WR000328, 2003. Ferraris, L., Rudari, R., and Siccardi, F.: The uncertainty in the prediction of flash floods in the Northern Mediterranean environment, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 714–727, 2002. Georgakakos, K. P., Seo, D.-J., Gupta, H., Schaake, J., and Butts, M. B.: Characterising streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles. J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 222–241, 2004. Gerlinger, K. and Demuth, N.: Operational flood forecasting for the Moselle river basin, PIK Report no. 65, Proc. of European Conf. on advances in flood research, edited by: Bronsert A., Bismuth, C., and Menzel, C., Potsdam-Institut für klimafolgenforschung, 562–573, 2000. Grell, G. A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R.: A description of the fifth-generation of the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5), NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, Boulder, USA, 1995. Hearman, A. J. and Hinz, C.: Sensitivity of point scale surface runoff predictions to rainfall resolution, Hydrol. Earth Sci., 11(2), 965–982, 2007. Hewitson, B. C. and Crane, R. G.: Large-scale atmospheric controls on local precipitation in tropical Mexico, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1835–1838, 1992. Hong, S.-Y. and Pan, H.-L.: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model, Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2322–2339, 1996. Jasper, K. and Kaufmann, P.: Coupled runoff simulations as validation tools for atmospheric modelsat the regional scale, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 673–692, 2003. Jolliffe, I. T. and Stephenson, D. B.: Forecast verification, A practitioner's guide in atmospheric science, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, England, 240 pp., 2003. Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: The role of the convective "trigger function" in numerical forecasts of mesoscale convective systems, Meteor. Atmos. Phys. Amer., 49, 93–106, 1992. Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain-Fritsch scheme. The representation of cumulus in numerical models, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 24, 165–170, 1993. Koren, V. I., Reed, S., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., and Seo, D.-J.: Hydrology Laboratory Research Modeling System (HL-RMS) of the National Weather Service, J. Hydrol., 291, 297–318, 2004. Krajewski, W. F.: Cokriging radar-rainfall and rain gauge data, J. Geophys. Res., 92(D8), 9571–9580, 1987. Kunstmann, H. and Stadler, C.: Operational high resolution meteorological and hydrological analysis as decision support system in integrated water resources management, in: IAHS Redbook "Integrated water resources management: Towards sustainable water utilization in the 21st century", edited by: Görgens, A. et al., IAHS Redbook, 2004. Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H.: Hydrology for engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 3rd edition, 508 pp., 1982. Liu, Z. and Todini, E.: Towards a comprehensive physically-based rainfall-runoff model, Hydrol. Earth Sci., 6, 859–881, 2002. Mariani, S., Casaioli, M., Accadia, C. and Coauthors: A limited area model intercomparison on the "Monserrat-2000" flash-flood event using statistical and deterministic methods, Nat. Haz. Earth Sci., 5, 565–581, 2005. Mazzetti, C. and Todini, E.: Deliverable 7.1 – Development and application of the block Kriging technique to rain-gauge data, Resulting from Work package 7, MUSIC Multi-sensor Precipitation calibration and flood forecasting, project supported by the European Commission under Contract No. EVK1-CT-2000-00058, (www.geomin.unibo.it/orgv/hydro/music/index2.htm), 2004. Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validate correlated-k model for the long wave, J. Geophys. Rev., 102(D14), 16 663–16 682, 1997. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I: A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290, 1970. Obled, C., Djerboua, A., Zin, I., and Garçon, R.: A simple probabilistic flood forecasting chain with focus on the use of QPF's, Proc. of the ESF LESC Exploration Workshop, Bologna, Italy, in: Hydrological risk – recent advances in peak river flow modelling, prediction and real-time forecasting - assessment of the impacts of land-use and climate changes, edited by: Brath, A., Montanari, A., and Toth, E.,Editoriale Bios, Castrolibero, CS, Italy, 168-185, 2004. Ranzi, R., Bacchi, B., Grossi, G., Buzzi, A., Malguzzi, P., Ratto, C., and Corazza M.: Previsioni di piena mediante un modello idrologico e un modello meteorologico ad area limitata: alcune esperienze applicative durante l'esperimento MAP-SOP. Atti del XXVII Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Genova, 12–15 settembre 2000, Vol. II, 385–393, 2000. Ranzi, R., Bacchi, B., and Grossi, G.: Runoff measurements and hydrological modelling for the estimation of rainfall volumes in an Alpine Basin, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 653–672, 2003. Refsgaard, J. C. and Knudsen, J.: Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models, Water Res. Research, 32(7), 2189–2202, 1996. Reisner, J., Rasmussen, R. J., and Bruintjes, R. T.: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124B, 1071–1107, 1998. Ritter, B. and Geleyn, J. F.: A comprehensive radiation scheme for numerical weather prediction models with potential applications in climate simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 303–325, 1992. Roeckner, E., Bengtsson, L., Feichter, J., and Rodhe, H.: Transient climate change simulations with a coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM including the tropospheric sulphur cycle, Max Planck Institut für Meteorologie, Rep., 266, Hamburg, Germany, 1998. Seo, D. J.: Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data, J. Hydrol., 208, 37–52, 1998. Stensrud, D. J. and Fritsch, J. M.: Mesoscale convective systems in weakly forced large-scale environments. Part II: Generation of a mesoscale initial condition, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 2068–2083, 1994a. Stensrud, D. J. and Fritsch, J. M.: Mesoscale convective systems in weakly forced large-scale environments, Part III: Numerical simulations and implications for operational forecasting, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 2084–2104, 1994b. Steppeler, J., Doms, G., Schättler, U., Bitzer, H. W., Gassmann, A., Damrath, U., Gregoric, G.: Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the non-hydrostatic model LM, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 82, 75–96, 2003. Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1799, 1989. Todini, E.: AFORISM – A comprehensive forecasting system for flood risk mitigation and control, Final report of Contract EPOC-CT90-0023, 1995. Todini, E.: Influence of parameter estimation uncertainty in Kriging, Part 1, Theoretical development, Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci., 5(2), 215–223, 2001. Todini, E. and Ciarapica, L.: The TOPKAPI model, in: Mathematical Models of Large Watershed Hydrology, edited by: Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, USA, 914 pp., 2002. Todini, E.: Hydrological catchment modelling: past, present and future, Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci., 11(1), 468–482, 2007. Tomassetti, B., Coppola, E., Verdecchia, M., and Visconti, G.: Coupling a distributed grid based hydrological model and MM5 Meteorological model for flooding alert mapping, EGU, Advances in Geosciences, 2, 59–63, 2005. Tribbia, J. J. and Baumhefner, D. P.: The reliability of improvements in deterministic short-range forecasts in presence of initial state and modeling deficiencies, Mon. Weather Rev., 116, 2276–2288, 1988. US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center: HEC-HMS Hydrologic Modeling system user's manual, USACE-HEC, Davis, California, 188 pp., 1998. US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center: Hydrologic Modeling system HEC-HMS, Technical reference manual, USACE-HEC, Davis, California, 157 pp., 2000. US Department of Agriculture: Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical release 55 of the Nature Resources Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA, 1986. von Storch, H. and Zwiers, F.W.: Statistical Analysis in Climate Research. Cambridge University Press, 494 pp., 1999. Wilks, D.: Multisite downscaling of daily rainfall with a stochastic weather generator, Clim. Res., 11, 125–136, 1999. Wilks, D. S.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Second edition. Elsiever Academic Press Publications, International Geophysics Sciences, 627 pp., 2006. Zhang, D. L. and Anthes, R. A.: A high resolution model of the planetary boundary layer, Sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 1594–1609, 1982. Zhang, D. L. and Fritsch, J. M.: Numerical simulation of the meso-β scale structure and evolution of the 1977 Johnstown flood, Part I: Model description and verification, J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 1913–1943, 1986. Zhang, D. L., Chang, H. R., Seaman, N. L., Warner, T. T., and Fritsch, J. M.: A two-way interactive nesting procedure with variable terrain resolution, Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1330–1339, 1986.