<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/nhess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1561-8633</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9981</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/nhess-9-61-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/61/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/61/2009/nhess-9-61-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/61/2009/nhess-9-61-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>61</start_page>
	<end_page>75</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-01-20</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Structural master plan of flood mitigation measures</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Heidari</name>
			<email>al.heidari@iwpco.com</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Iran Water and Power resources development Co. (IWPC), Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Flood protection is one of the practical methods in damage reduction.
Although it not possible to be completely protected from flood disaster but
major part of damages can be reduced by mitigation plans. In this paper, the
optimum flood mitigation master plan is determined by economic evaluation in
trading off between the construction costs and expected value of damage
reduction as the benefits. Size of the certain mitigation alternative is also
be obtained by risk analysis by accepting possibility of flood overtopping.
Different flood mitigation alternatives are investigated from various aspects
in the Dez and Karun river floodplain areas as a case study in south west of
IRAN. The results show that detention dam and flood diversion are the best
alternatives of flood mitigation methods as well as enforcing the flood
control purpose of upstream multipurpose reservoirs. Dyke and levees are not
mostly justifiable because of negative impact on down stream by enhancing
routed flood peak discharge magnitude and flood damages as well.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Cheng, S T., Yen, B C., and Tang, W H.: Stochastic risk modeling of dam overtopping, in: Reliability and Uncertainty Analyses in Hydraulic Design, edited by: Yen, B C. and Tung, Y K., ASCE, 123–132, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Flood Damage Reduction Analysis: HEC-FDA User&apos;s Manual, US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA, 72~pp., 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Tang, W H. and Yen, B C.: Probabilistic inspection scheduling for dams, in: Reliability and Uncertainty Analyses in Hydraulic Design, edited by: Yen, B C. and Tung, Y K., ASCE, New York, 107–122, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Tung, Y K.: Risk-based design of flood defense systems, Flood Defense, Science Press, New York, 71–81, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Tung, Y K. and Mays, L W.: Risk and reliability model for levee design, Water Resour. Res., 17(4), 833–842, 1981a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Tung, Y K. and Mays, L W.: Optimal risk-based design of flood levee systems, Water Resour. Res., 17(4), 843–852, 1981b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> van Stokkom, H T C. and Smits, A. J. M.: Flood defense in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approach, Flood Defense, Science Press, New York, 34–47, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Vrijling, J K.: Development in Probabilistic Design of Flood Defenses in the Netherlands, in: Reliability and Uncertainty Analyses in Hydraulic Design, edited by: Yen, B C. and Tung, Y K., ASCE, 133–178, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Yen, B C. and Jun, B H.: Risk consideration in design of storm drains, Proceedings, Third IAHR/IAWPRC International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, 2, 695–704, 1984. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

