Natural Hazards and Earth System Science www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net 1561-8633 1684-9981 9 3 2009 10.5194/nhess-9-767-2009 http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/767/2009/ http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/767/2009/nhess-9-767-2009.html http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/767/2009/nhess-9-767-2009.pdf 767 778 2009-05-19 Spatial vulnerability units – expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria S. Kienberger stefan.kienberger@sbg.ac.at S. Lang P. Zeil Centre for Geoinformatics (Z_GIS), Salzburg University, Schillerstrasse 30, 5020 Salzburg, Austria The assessment of vulnerability has moved to centre-stage of the debate between different scientific disciplines related to climate change and disaster risk management. Composed by a combination of social, economical, physical and environmental factors the assessment implies combining different domains as well as quantitative with qualitative data and makes it therefore a challenge to identify an integrated metric for vulnerability. In this paper we define vulnerability in the context of climate change, targeting the hazard "flood". The developed methodology is being tested in the Salzach river catchment in Austria, which is largely prone to floods. The proposed methodology allows the spatial quantification of vulnerability and the identification of vulnerability units. These units build upon the geon concept which acts as a framework for the regionalization of continuous spatial information according to defined parameters of homogeneity. Using geons, we are capable of transforming singular domains of information on specific systemic components to policy-relevant, conditioned information. Considering the fact that vulnerability is not directly measurable and due to its complex dimension and social construction an expert-based approach has been chosen. Established methodologies such as Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Delphi exercises and regionalization approaches are being integrated. The method not only enables the assessment of vulnerability independent from administrative boundaries, but also applies an aggregation mode which reflects homogenous vulnerability units. This supports decision makers to reflect on complex issues such as vulnerability. Next to that, the advantage is to decompose the units to their underlying domains. Feedback from disaster management experts indicates that the approach helps to improve the design of measures aimed at strengthening preparedness and mitigation. From this point of view, we reach a step closer towards validation of the proposed method, comprising critical user-oriented aspects like adequateness, practicability and usability of the provided results in general. % vor jede Referenz Baatz, M. and Schäpe, A.: Multiresolution Segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation, in: Proceedings of the Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII., edited by: Strobl, J., Blaschke, T., Griesebner, G., et al., Beiträge zum AGIT Symposium Salzburg, 12–23, 2000. Beinat, E.: Value Functions for Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Pub., 1997. Birkmann, J. (ed.): Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards, Towards Disaster Resilient Societies, United Nations University Press, 2006. Bogardi, J., Villagrán, J. C., Birkmann, J., Renaud, F., Sakulski, D., Chen, X., Affeltranger, B., Mensa, A., and Kaplan, M.: Vulnerability in the context of climate change, Human Security and Climate Change, An International Workshop, Asker, Sweden, 2005. Carver, S. J.: Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 5(3), 321–339, doi:10.1080/02693799108927858, 1991. Clark, M. J., Hutton, C. W., Amoaka Johnson, F., Steyl, I., Kienberger, S., Zeil, P., and Lang, S.: Defining vulnerability Towards a conceptual model for climate change impact, Deliverable Report Nr 4.5, 2007. Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E., and Romo Aguilar, M. L.: Vulnerability to environmental hazards in the Ciudad Jua'rez (Mexico) – El Paso (USA) metropolis: A model for spatial risk assessment in transnational context, Appl. Geogr., doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.005, in press, 2008. Cutter, S. L.: Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards, Prog. Hum. Geog., 20, 52–539, doi:10.1177/030913259602000407, 1996. Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., and Scott, M. S.: Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 90(4), 713–737, doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00219, 2000. Cutter, S. L.: The Geography of Social Vulnerability: Race, Class, Catastrophe, Perspectives from the Social Sciences, online available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Cutter/, 2005. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, J., and Webb, J.: A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters, Glob. Environ. Chang., 18, 598–606, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013, 2008. Dilley, M., Chen, R. S., Deichmann, U., Lerner-Lam, A. L., and Arnold, M.: Natural Disaster Hotspots, A Global Risk Analysis, World Bank, 2005. Ebohon, B. and Schrott, L.: Modeling Mountain Permafrost Distribution. A New Permafrost Map of Austria, in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Permafrost, edited by: Kane, D. and Hinkel, K.: Fairbanks, Alaska, 397–402, 2008. European Commission: Guidance for the analysis of Pressures and Impacts in accordance with the Water Framework Directive, Board of Water Directors, 2002a. European Commission: Analysis of pressures and impacts the key implementation requirements of the water framework directive policy summary to the guidance document, Board of Water Directors, 2002b. European Commission: Pressure and Impacts Analysis, Board of Water Directors, 2002c. Fekete, A.: Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 393–403, 2009. Flügel, W.: Hydrological Response Units (HRU's) as modelling entities for hydrological river basin simulation and their methodological potential for modelling complex environmental process systems – Results from the Sieg catchment, Die Erde, 127, 43–62, 1996. Gall, M.: Indices of Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: A Comparative Evaluation, PhD, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA, 2007. Greiving, S., Fleischhauer, M., and Lückenkötter, J.: A methodology for an integrated risk assessment of spatially relevant hazards, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(1), 1–19, doi:10.1080/09640560500372800, 2006. Helmer, O.: The Use of the Delphi Technique in Problems of Educational Innovations, Rand Documents No. P-3499 (Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation), 1966. Hewitt, K. and Burton, I.: The Hazardousness of a Place: A Regional Ecology of Damaging Events, Department of Geography Research publication 6, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 1971. Hufschmidt, G., Crozier, M., and Glade, T.: Evolution of natural risk: research framework and perspectives, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 375–387, 2005. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate Change 2001: Synthesis report, World Meteorological Organization, UN Environment Programme, Geneva, 2001a. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution to the Working Group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001b. Jiang, H. and Eastman, J. R.: Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 14(2), 173–184, doi:10.1080/136588100240903, 2000. Kienberger, S., Lang, S., and Tiede, D.: Socio-economic vulnerability units – modelling meaningful spatial units, Proceedings of the GIS Research UK 16th Annual conference GISRUK 2008, Manchester, UK, 2008. Kienberger, S., Amoaka Johnson, F., Zeil, P., Hutton, C. W., Lang, S., and Clark, M.: The integration of Land Use/Land Cover data within the modelling of socio-economic vulnerabilities. Proceedings of the 10th High Mountain Remote Sensing and Cartography Symposium, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2009. Lang, S. and Blaschke, T.: Bridging remote sensing and GIS – what are the most supportive pillars?, in: International Archives of Photogrammetry, edited by: Lang, S. and Blaschke, T., Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences vol. XXXVI-4/C42, CD-ROM, 2006. Lang, S.: Object-based image analysis for remote sensing applications: modeling reality – dealing with complexity, in: Object-Based Image Analysis – Spatial concepts for knowledge-driven remote sensing applications, edited by: Blaschke, T., Lang, S., Hay, G. J., et al., New York, Springer, USA, 3–28, 2008. Lang, S., Zeil, P., Kienberger, S., and Tiede, D.: Geons – policy-relevant geo-objects for monitoring high-level indicators, in: Geospatial Crossroads @ GI_Forum '08, edited by: Car, A., Griesebner, G. and Strobl, J., Proceedings of the Geoinformatics Forum Salzburg, 180–185, 2008. Leidel, M.: Enhancement of the concept of vulnerability units and its integration into water resources management, MSc., TU Munich, Germany, 2008. Lieb, G. K.: High-Mountain permafrost in the Austrian Alps (Europe). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Permafrost, Yellowknife, Canada, 23–27 June, 663–668, 1998. Malczewski, J.: GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 1999. Malczewski, J.: On the Use of Weighted Linear Combination Method in GIS: Common and Best Practice Approaches, Transactions in GIS, 4(1), 5–22, doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00035, 2000. Mennis, J.: Generating Surface Models of Population Using Dasymetric Mapping, The Prof. Geogr., 55(1), 31–42, doi:10.1111/0033-0124.10042, 2003. November, V.: Spatiality of risk, Environ. Plann. A, 40, 1523–1527, doi:10.1068/a4194, 2008. Oberndorfer, S., Fuchs, S., Rickenmann, D., and Andrecs, P.: Vulnerabilitätsanalyse und monetäre Schandensbewertung von Wildbachereignissen in Österreich, Schriftenreihe des Bundesforschungs- und Ausbildungszentrums für Wald, Naturgefahren und Landschaft, 139, 2007. Openshaw, S.: The modifiable areal unit problem, Concepts and techniques in modern geography, 38, 1984 Robinson, V. B.: A perspective on the fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets and their Use in Geographic Information Systems, Transactions in GIS, 7(1), 3–30, doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00127, 2003. Schneiderbauer, S.: Risk and Vulnerability to Natural Disasters – from Broad View to Focused Perspective: Theoretical background and applied methods for the identification of the most endangered populations in two case studies at different scales, Dissertation at the Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin, Germany, 2007. Smeets, E. and Weterings, R.: Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview, Technical report no. 25, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 1999. Smith, B.: On drawing lines on a map, in: Proceedings of COSIT 1995, Spatial Information Theory, edited by: Frank, A., Kuhn, W., and Mark, D. M., Springer, Berlin, 475–484, 1995. Smith, B. and Mark, D. M.: Ontology and Geographic Kinds, Proceedings, International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH'98), Vancouver, Canada, 12–15 July, 308–320, 1998. Stalzer, W.: Bestandsaufnahme und Beurteilung der gesamten Hochwasserfolgen, ÖWAV Symposium, März 2003, Wien, 2003. Tiede, D. and Lang, S.: Analytical 3-D views and virtual globes – scientific results in familiar spatial context, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Theme issue: Visualization and Exploration of Geospatial Data, pages pending, in press, 2009. Thomalla, F., Downing, T., Spanger-Siegfried, E., Han, G., and Rockström, J.: Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation, Disasters, 30(1), 39–48, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x, 2006. Thywissen, K.: Components of Risk. A Comparative Glossary, UNU Institute for Environment and Human Security, Source Nr. 2, 2006. Turner II, B. L., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Hovelsrud-Broda, G. K., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Mathiesen, S., Naylor, R., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., Schiller, A., Selin, H., and Tyler, N.: Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 100, 8080–8085, doi:10.1073/pnas.1231334100, 2003. UN/ISDR (International Strategy for Disaster Reduction): Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initatives, Geneva: UN Publications, 2004. Villagrán, J. C. V.: Vulnerability: a conceptual and methodological review, UNU Institute for Environment and Human Security, Source Nr. 4, 2006. Wonka, E.: Regionalstatistik in Österreich. Von der Tabelle zu räumlicher Analyse und Visualisierung, in: Salzburger Geographische Arbeiten, edited by: Strobl, J., Band 39, Salzburg und Wien, 2006.