Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.281 IF 2.281
  • IF 5-year value: 2.693 IF 5-year
    2.693
  • CiteScore value: 2.43 CiteScore
    2.43
  • SNIP value: 1.193 SNIP 1.193
  • SJR value: 0.965 SJR 0.965
  • IPP value: 2.31 IPP 2.31
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 73 Scimago H
    index 73
Volume 12, issue 9 | Copyright

Special issue: Forecast and projection in climate scenario of Mediterranean...

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 2769-2784, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2769-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 06 Sep 2012

Research article | 06 Sep 2012

Dynamical and statistical downscaling of the French Mediterranean climate: uncertainty assessment

M. Vrac1, P. Drobinski2, A. Merlo1,2, M. Herrmann3, C. Lavaysse2, L. Li2, and S. Somot4 M. Vrac et al.
  • 1Institut Pierre Simon Laplace/Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement, CNRS/CEA/UVSQ, UMR8212, CNRS/INSU – Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement (LSCE), Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Institut Pierre Simon Laplace/Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS/Ecole Polytechnique/ENS/UPMC, Palaiseau, France
  • 3Laboratoire d' Études en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales, CNRS/CNES/IRD/OMP, Toulouse, France
  • 4Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France

Abstract. ERA-40 reanalyses, and simulations from three regional climate models (RCMs) (ALADIN, LMDZ, and WRF) and from one statistical downscaling model (CDF-t) are used to evaluate the uncertainty in downscaling of wind, temperature, and rainfall cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) for eight stations in the French Mediterranean basin over 1991–2000. The uncertainty is quantified using the Cramer-von Mises score (CvM) to measure the "distance" between the simulated and observed CDFs. The ability of the three RCMs and CDF-t to simulate the "climate" variability is quantified with the explained variance, variance ratio and extreme occurrence. The study shows that despite their differences, the three RCMs display very similar performance. In terms of global distributions (i.e. CvM), all models perform better than ERA-40 for both seasons and variables. However, looking at variance criteria, RCMs are not always much better than ERA-40 reanalyses, whereas CDF-t produces accurate results when applied to ERA-40. In a second step, a combined statistical/dynamical downscaling approach has been used, consisting in applying CDF-t to the RCM outputs. It shows that CDF-t applied to the RCM outputs does not necessarily produce better results than those from CDF-t directly applied to ERA-40. It also shows that CDF-t applied to RCMs generally improves the downscaled CDFs and that the "additional" added value of CDF-t applied to the RCMs is independent of the performance of the RCMs in terms of CvM, explained variance, variance ratio and extreme occurrence.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share