25 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Social network efficiency of multiple stakeholders on agricultural drought risk governance — A southern China case study Y. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101772
2. Exploring the institutional determinants of risk governance: A comparative approach across nations W. Zuo et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.022
3. Participatory and collaborative governance for sustainable flood risk management: An emerging research agenda E. Challies et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.012
4. Risk Communication on Floodings: Insights Into the Risk Awareness of Migrants in Rural Communities in Austria K. Weber et al. 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00060.1
5. Risk perception of local stakeholders on natural hazards: implications for theory and practice M. Mărgărint et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-3251-2021
6. The FLOODLABEL as a social innovation in flood risk management to increase homeowners' resilience H. Meyer & T. Hartmann 10.1111/jfr3.12962
7. Introduction to the RISC-KIT web based management guide for DRR in European coastal zones N. Stelljes et al. 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.09.012
8. A Research and Innovation Agenda for Zero-Emission European Cities F. Fuso Nerini et al. 10.3390/su11061692
9. Reputational risks and participation in flood risk management and the public debate about the 2013 flood in Germany C. Kuhlicke et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.011
10. Components and Drivers of Long-term Risk Communication: Exploring the Within-Communicator, Relational, and Content Dimensions in the Swedish Forest Context L. Eriksson 10.1177/1086026616649647
11. Adaptive and risk-based approaches to climate change and the management of uncertainty and institutional risk: The case of future flooding in England C. Kuklicke & D. Demeritt 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.007
12. Improving the Assessment of Potential and Actual Impacts of Climate Change and Extreme Events Through a Parallel Modeling of Climatic and Societal Changes at Different Scales S. Greiving et al. 10.1142/S2345737618500033
13. Climate resilience and environmental justice: state of research and implementation in planning practice in Germany and beyond S. Greiving & M. Fleischhauer 10.3828/tpr.2021.26
14. Tracing the past: an insight on flood risk management strategies in the development instruments of Bangladesh and Dhaka city M. Fatemi et al. 10.2166/wp.2020.006
15. Tailor-made risk governance for induced seismicity of geothermal energy projects: An application to Switzerland E. Trutnevyte & S. Wiemer 10.1016/j.geothermics.2016.10.006
16. Flood insurance rate map for non-structural mitigation R. Roslan et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20197603002
17. The shifting position of homeowners in flood resilience: From recipients to key‐stakeholders K. Snel et al. 10.1002/wat2.1451
18. Moving towards sustainable coasts: A critical evaluation of a stakeholder engagement group in successfully delivering the mechanism of adaptive management R. Creed et al. 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.009
19. Comparing the spatial patterns of earthquake disaster probability and individual risk perception: a case study of Yongkang Township in Tainan, Taiwan H. Chang et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3369-x
20. Taking stock of decentralized disaster risk reduction in Indonesia A. Grady et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-2145-2016
21. Lost in participation: How local knowledge was overlooked in land use planning and risk governance in Tōhoku, Japan J. Puppim de Oliveira & U. Fra.Paleo 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.023
22. Raumordnerische Risikovorsorge am Beispiel der Planungsregion Köln S. Greiving et al. 10.1007/s13147-016-0387-6
23. A framework for evaluating flood risk governance M. Alexander et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
24. A Study of Disaster Risk Communication and Adaptive Behaviour based on Rail Station Protection K. Huang & J. Pai 10.14246/irspsd.7.3_4
25. Multi-risk governance for natural hazards in Naples and Guadeloupe A. Scolobig et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1152-1