Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.281 IF 2.281
  • IF 5-year value: 2.693 IF 5-year 2.693
  • CiteScore value: 2.43 CiteScore 2.43
  • SNIP value: 1.193 SNIP 1.193
  • SJR value: 0.965 SJR 0.965
  • IPP value: 2.31 IPP 2.31
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 73 Scimago H index 73
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 871-889, 2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
14 Apr 2014
The validation service of the hydrological SAF geostationary and polar satellite precipitation products
S. Puca1, F. Porcu2, A. Rinollo1, G. Vulpiani1, P. Baguis3, S. Balabanova9, E. Campione1, A. Ertürk4, S. Gabellani5, R. Iwanski6, M. Jurašek7, J. Kaňák7, J. Kerényi8, G. Koshinchanov9, G. Kozinarova9, P. Krahe10, B. Lapeta6, E. Lábó8, L. Milani2,13, L'. Okon7, A. Öztopal11, P. Pagliara1, F. Pignone5, C. Rachimow10, N. Rebora5, E. Roulin3, I. Sönmez4, A. Toniazzo1, D. Biron12, D. Casella13, E. Cattani13, S. Dietrich13, F. Di Paola13,16, S. Laviola13, V. Levizzani13, D. Melfi12, A. Mugnai13, G. Panegrossi13, M. Petracca2,13, P. Sanò13, F. Zauli12, P. Rosci14, L. De Leonibus14, E. Agosta15, and F. Gattari15 1Italian Civil Protection Department, via Vitorchiano 2, 00189 Rome, Italy
2University of Ferrara – Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, via Saragat 1, 44122 Ferrara, Italy
3Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
4Ondokuz Mayis University, Department of Meteorological Engineering, Samsun/Merkez, Turkey
5CIMA Research Foundation, Savona, Italy
6Satellite Research Department, Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Kraków, Poland
7Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
8OMSZ-Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary
9National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
10Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), Koblenz, Germany
11Istanbul Technical University, Department of Meteorological Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey
12Centro Nazionale di Meteorologia e Climatologia Aeronautica (CNMCA), Pratica di Mare, Italy
13Istituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima (CNR-ISAC), Bologna-Rome, Italy
14Italian Air Force Meteorological Service General Office for Air Space and Meteorology, Rome, Italy
15Telespazio, Rome, Italy
16Istituto di Metodologie per l'Analisi Ambientale (CNR-IMAA), Tito Scalo, Italy
Abstract. The development phase (DP) of the EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility for Support to Operational Hydrology and Water Management (H-SAF) led to the design and implementation of several precipitation products, after 5 yr (2005–2010) of activity. Presently, five precipitation estimation algorithms based on data from passive microwave and infrared sensors, on board geostationary and sun-synchronous platforms, function in operational mode at the H-SAF hosting institute to provide near real-time precipitation products at different spatial and temporal resolutions.

In order to evaluate the precipitation product accuracy, a validation activity has been established since the beginning of the project. A Precipitation Product Validation Group (PPVG) works in parallel with the development of the estimation algorithms with two aims: to provide the algorithm developers with indications to refine algorithms and products, and to evaluate the error structure to be associated with the operational products.

In this paper, the framework of the PPVG is presented: (a) the characteristics of the ground reference data available to H-SAF (i.e. radar and rain gauge networks), (b) the agreed upon validation strategy settled among the eight European countries participating in the PPVG, and (c) the steps of the validation procedures. The quality of the reference data is discussed, and the efforts for its improvement are outlined, with special emphasis on the definition of a ground radar quality map and on the implementation of a suitable rain gauge interpolation algorithm. The work done during the H-SAF development phase has led the PPVG to converge into a common validation procedure among the members, taking advantage of the experience acquired by each one of them in the validation of H-SAF products. The methodology is presented here, indicating the main steps of the validation procedure (ground data quality control, spatial interpolation, up-scaling of radar data vs. satellite grid, statistical score evaluation, case study analysis).

Finally, an overview of the results is presented, focusing on the monthly statistical indicators, referred to the satellite product performances over different seasons and areas.

Citation: Puca, S., Porcu, F., Rinollo, A., Vulpiani, G., Baguis, P., Balabanova, S., Campione, E., Ertürk, A., Gabellani, S., Iwanski, R., Jurašek, M., Kaňák, J., Kerényi, J., Koshinchanov, G., Kozinarova, G., Krahe, P., Lapeta, B., Lábó, E., Milani, L., Okon, L'., Öztopal, A., Pagliara, P., Pignone, F., Rachimow, C., Rebora, N., Roulin, E., Sönmez, I., Toniazzo, A., Biron, D., Casella, D., Cattani, E., Dietrich, S., Di Paola, F., Laviola, S., Levizzani, V., Melfi, D., Mugnai, A., Panegrossi, G., Petracca, M., Sanò, P., Zauli, F., Rosci, P., De Leonibus, L., Agosta, E., and Gattari, F.: The validation service of the hydrological SAF geostationary and polar satellite precipitation products, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 871-889,, 2014.
Publications Copernicus