Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.883 IF 2.883
  • IF 5-year value: 3.321 IF 5-year
    3.321
  • CiteScore value: 3.07 CiteScore
    3.07
  • SNIP value: 1.336 SNIP 1.336
  • IPP value: 2.80 IPP 2.80
  • SJR value: 1.024 SJR 1.024
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 81 Scimago H
    index 81
  • h5-index value: 43 h5-index 43
Volume 16, issue 5
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1175–1188, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1175-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1175–1188, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1175-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 23 May 2016

Research article | 23 May 2016

Smartphone applications for communicating avalanche risk information – a study on how they are developed and evaluated by their providers

Marie K. M. Charrière and Thom A. Bogaard
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,151 689 33 1,873 238 48 40
  • HTML: 1,151
  • PDF: 689
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 1,873
  • Supplement: 238
  • BibTeX: 48
  • EndNote: 40
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Nov 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Nov 2015)
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Jan 2020
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
This paper present the results of interviews that were conducted with the developers of apps dedicated to avalanche risk communication. The study investigates the context of their development to determine how choices of content and visualization were made as well as how their effectiveness is evaluated. Results show that consensus is achieved in terms of message but not in terms of visualization. However, progress remains in terms of effectiveness evaluation.
This paper present the results of interviews that were conducted with the developers of apps...
Citation