Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.281 IF 2.281
  • IF 5-year value: 2.693 IF 5-year 2.693
  • CiteScore value: 2.43 CiteScore 2.43
  • SNIP value: 1.193 SNIP 1.193
  • SJR value: 0.965 SJR 0.965
  • IPP value: 2.31 IPP 2.31
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 73 Scimago H index 73
Volume 16, issue 6 | Copyright

Special issue: Resilience and v​ulnerability assessm​ents in natural...

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1387-1399, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1387-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 15 Jun 2016

Research article | 15 Jun 2016

A review of multivariate social vulnerability methodologies: a case study of the River Parrett catchment, UK

I. Willis and J. Fitton
Related subject area
Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Assessing fragility of a reinforced concrete element to snow avalanches using a non-linear dynamic mass-spring model
Philomène Favier, David Bertrand, Nicolas Eckert, Isabelle Ousset, and Mohamed Naaim
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2507-2524, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2507-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2507-2018, 2018
Review article: Climate change impacts on dam safety
Javier Fluixá-Sanmartín, Luis Altarejos-García, Adrián Morales-Torres, and Ignacio Escuder-Bueno
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2471-2488, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2471-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2471-2018, 2018
Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries
Isabel Seifert-Dähnn
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2409-2429, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2409-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2409-2018, 2018
A comparison of building value models for flood risk analysis
Veronika Röthlisberger, Andreas P. Zischg, and Margreth Keiler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2431-2453, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2431-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2431-2018, 2018
Estimating network related risks: A methodology and an application in the transport sector
Jürgen Hackl, Juan Carlos Lam, Magnus Heitzler, Bryan T. Adey, and Lorenz Hurni
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2273-2293, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2273-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2273-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., and Agnew, M.: New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Technical Report, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Tyndall, P15–P19, 2004.
Bellù, L. G. and Liberati, P.: Inequality analysis: The gini index, EASYPol Module, FAO, 40 pp., http://www.fao.org/docs/up/easypol/329/gini_index_040en.pdf (last access: June 2016), 2006.
Birkmann, J.: Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, United Nations University Press, 1, 9–54, 2006.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., Keiler, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P., and Welle, T.: Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework, Nat. Hazards, 67, 193–211, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5, 2013.
Bolin, R., Jackson, M., and Crist, A.: Gender inequality, vulnerability, and disaster: Issues in theory and research. The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women's eyes, Canberra, Australia, 8–16, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257343322_Quantifying_Social_Vulnerability_A_methodology_for_identifying_those_at_risk_to_natural_hazards (last access: June 2016), 1998.
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
In the field of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), there is a proliferation of research into different ways to measure, represent, and ultimately quantify differential social vulnerability to natural hazards. This study shows how the same census data but three alternative multivariate methodologies can lead to radical differences in our assessment of the most vulnerable population groups to flood risk. A case study of the 2013 floods in the Parrett catchment, Somerset (UK), provides context.
In the field of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), there is a proliferation of research into...
Citation
Share