64 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Exposure Elements in Disaster Databases and Availability for Local Scale Application: Case Study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia N. Muhamad et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.616246
2. Identification of methodologies to quantify education system resilience—A scoping review J. Dülks et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103967
3. A Robust and Transferable Model for the Prediction of Flood Losses on Household Contents M. Mosimann et al. 10.3390/w10111596
4. Triggers of change to achieve sustainable, resilient, and adaptive cities M. Mendizabal et al. 10.1016/j.cacint.2021.100071
5. Improved Framework for Assessing Vulnerability to Different Types of Urban Floods Q. Yang et al. 10.3390/su12187668
6. Vulnerability assessment including tangible and intangible components in the index composition: An Amazon case study of flooding and flash flooding M. Andrade & C. Szlafsztein 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.271
7. Indicator-based approach for the assessment of intrinsic physical vulnerability of the built environment to hydro-meteorological hazards: Review of indicators and example of parameters selection for a sample area R. Agliata et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102199
8. Physical vulnerability to dynamic flooding: Vulnerability curves and vulnerability indices M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127501
9. Sensitivity analysis of a built environment exposed to the synthetic monophasic viscous debris flow impacts with 3-D numerical simulations X. Huang et al. 10.5194/nhess-23-871-2023
10. Assessing the vulnerability of food supply chains to climate change-induced disruptions R. Tchonkouang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171047
11. How to construct and validate an Integrated Socio-Economic Vulnerability Index: Implementation at regional scale in urban areas prone to flash flooding E. Aroca-Jiménez et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140905
12. Acquiring vulnerability indicators to geo-hydrological hazards: An example of mobile phone-based data collection P. Salvati et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102087
13. Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Bantul regency, Indonesia M. Aulady & T. Fujimi 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.756
14. Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: a multi-criteria approach M. de Brito et al. 10.5194/hess-22-373-2018
15. The impact of the aggregation formula on indicator-based method for the assessment of building susceptibility to hydro-meteorological hazards R. Agliata et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102850
16. Developing a probability-based technique to improve the measurement of landslide vulnerability on regional roads Q. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109918
17. Terminology of natural hazards and disasters: A review and the case of Brazil B. Monte et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101970
18. Hybrid approach for flood susceptibility assessment in a flood-prone mountainous catchment in China L. Fang et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128091
19. Safeguarding cultural heritage from climate change related hydrometeorological hazards in Central Europe A. Bonazza et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102455
20. Holistic characterization of flash flood vulnerability: Construction and validation of an integrated multidimensional vulnerability index E. Aroca-Jiménez et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128083
21. Evaluating the Impact of Explosive Volcanic Eruptions on a Groundwater-Fed Water Supply System: An Exploratory Study in Ponta Delgada, São Miguel (Azores, Portugal) F. Valente et al. 10.3390/w14071022
22. Human Vulnerability to Landslides W. Pollock & J. Wartman 10.1029/2020GH000287
23. The indispensable role of resilience in rational landslide risk management for social sustainability N. Tian & H. Lan 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.11.007
24. Large-scale application of the flood damage model RAilway Infrastructure Loss (RAIL) P. Kellermann et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-2357-2016
25. Dynamic Integrated Model for Disaster Management and Socioeconomic Analysis (DIM2SEA) E. Mas et al. 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1257
26. A framework for pluvial flood risk assessment in Alexandria considering the coping capacity B. Elboshy et al. 10.1007/s10669-018-9684-7
27. Landslide vulnerability assessment based on entropy method: a case study from Kegalle district, Sri Lanka E. Perera et al. 10.1007/s40808-019-00615-w
28. Debris Flow Damage Assessment by Considering Debris Flow Direction and Direction Angle of Structure in South Korea D. Nam et al. 10.3390/w11020328
29. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
30. Methods for the Assessment of Critical Properties in Existing Masonry Structures under Seismic Loads—The ARES Project M. Stepinac et al. 10.3390/app10051576
31. Indicator-based approach for assigning physical vulnerability of the houses to landslide hazard in the Himalayan region of India S. Bera et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101891
32. Establishment and characteristics analysis of a crop–drought vulnerability curve: a case study of European winter wheat Y. Wu et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-1209-2021
33. Advancing Data for Street-Level Flood Vulnerability: Evaluation of Variables Extracted from Google Street View in Quito, Ecuador R. Velez et al. 10.1109/OJCS.2022.3166887
34. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
35. Finite Element and Vulnerability Analyses of a Building Failure due to Landslide in Kaithakunda, Kerala, India R. Andrewwinner et al. 10.1155/2022/5297864
36. Assessing population exposure for landslide risk analysis using dasymetric cartography R. Garcia et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-2769-2016
37. Editorial to the special issue on resilience and vulnerability assessments in natural hazard and risk analysis S. Fuchs et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-1203-2017
38. Social Vulnerability Assessment for Flood Risk Analysis L. Tascón-González et al. 10.3390/w12020558
39. Using statistical functions and hydro-hydraulic models to develop human vulnerability curves for flash floods: The flash flood of the Taitou catchment (China) in 2016 T. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102876
40. Kinematic-based landslide risk management for the Sichuan-Tibet Grid Interconnection Project (STGIP) in China H. Lan et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106823
41. Quantifying crop vulnerability to weather-related extreme events and climate change through vulnerability curves B. Monteleone et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05791-0
42. Short communication: A model to predict flood loss in mountain areas S. Fuchs et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.026
43. Developing stage-specific drought vulnerability curves for maize: The case study of the Po River basin B. Monteleone et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107713
44. Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam B. Pham et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815
45. Developing flood vulnerability curve for rice crop using remote sensing and hydrodynamic modeling V. Hendrawan & D. Komori 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102058
46. Damage assessment in Braunsbach 2016: data collection and analysis for an improved understanding of damaging processes during flash floods J. Laudan et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-2163-2017
47. Locomotion of Slope Geohazards Responding to Climate Change in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and Its Adjacent Regions Y. Jia et al. 10.3390/su131910488
48. Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Hydrometric Analysis for Assessing and Mitigating Building Vulnerability to Flash Flood Risks M. Wahba et al. 10.3390/w16030434
49. Application of statistical techniques to proportional loss data: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of physical vulnerability to hazardous hydro-meteorological events C. Chow et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.084
50. Prioritization of hydroelectric power plant earth dam safety procedures: a multi-criteria approach J. Ribas et al. 10.1007/s12665-021-10096-9
51. Physical flood vulnerability assessment of buildings in Kota Bharu, Malaysia: an indicator-based approach I. Usman Kaoje et al. 10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2020-0046
52. A quantitative methodology for the assessment of the regional economic vulnerability to flash floods E. Aroca-Jiménez et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.029
53. Hydrodynamic modelling and vulnerability analysis to assess flood risk in a dense Indian city using geospatial techniques S. Bhattacharjee et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04392-z
54. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12712
55. Risk Assessment of Flash Flood to Buildings Using an Indicator-Based Methodology: A Case Study of Mountainous Rural Settlements in Southwest China Y. Zhen et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.931029
56. The Effect of Flood Protection Works on Flood Risk G. Mitsopoulos et al. 10.3390/w14233936
57. A Review of Emerging Technologies for an Assessment of Safety and Seismic Vulnerability and Damage Detection of Existing Masonry Structures M. Stepinac & M. Gašparović 10.3390/app10155060
58. Building vulnerability assessment in seismic areas using ensemble learning: A Nepal case study W. Chen & L. Zhang 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131418
59. Rockfall Vulnerability of a Rural Road Network—A Methodological Approach in the Harz Mountains, Germany A. Wohlers & B. Damm 10.3390/geosciences12040170
60. Physical vulnerability assessment of buildings exposed to landslides in India A. Singh et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-03568-y
61. Multi-variable flood damage modelling with limited data using supervised learning approaches D. Wagenaar et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-1683-2017
62. Physical Flood Vulnerability Assessment using Geospatial Indicator-Based Approach and Participatory Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Case Study in Kota Bharu, Malaysia I. Usman Kaoje et al. 10.3390/w13131786
63. Assessment of physical vulnerability of buildings and socio-economic vulnerability of residents to rainfall induced cut slope failures: A case study in central highlands, Sri Lanka C. Subasinghe & A. Kawasaki 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102550
64. Modelling Burglary Susceptibility – An Expert Judgement Approach S. Azmy et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012042