Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2151-2162, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2151-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
05 Dec 2017
What does nature have to do with it? Reconsidering distinctions in international disaster response frameworks in the Danube basin
Shanna N. McClain1, Silvia Secchi2, Carl Bruch3, and Jonathan W. F. Remo1,4 1Environmental Resources and Policy, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA
2Department of Geographical and Sustainability Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
3Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC, USA
4Department of Geography and Environmental Resources, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA
Abstract. This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to natural and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin, two transnational basins. Monitoring and response to these types of incidents have historically been managed separately. We discuss whether the policy distinctions in response to natural and man-made disasters remain functional given recent international trends toward holistic response to both kinds of disasters. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed, illustrate some of the specific gaps in the Danube and the Tisza, and conclude by proposing an integrated framework for disaster response in the Danube basin and Tisza sub-basin.

Citation: McClain, S. N., Secchi, S., Bruch, C., and Remo, J. W. F.: What does nature have to do with it? Reconsidering distinctions in international disaster response frameworks in the Danube basin, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2151-2162, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2151-2017, 2017.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to natural and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin, two transnational basins. Monitoring and response to these types of incidents have historically been managed separately. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed, illustrate some of the specific gaps in the Danube and the Tisza, and propose an integrated framework.
This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to...
Share