Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.281 IF 2.281
  • IF 5-year value: 2.693 IF 5-year 2.693
  • CiteScore value: 2.43 CiteScore 2.43
  • SNIP value: 1.193 SNIP 1.193
  • SJR value: 0.965 SJR 0.965
  • IPP value: 2.31 IPP 2.31
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 73 Scimago H index 73
Volume 17, issue 12 | Copyright
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2151-2162, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2151-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 05 Dec 2017

Research article | 05 Dec 2017

What does nature have to do with it? Reconsidering distinctions in international disaster response frameworks in the Danube basin

Shanna N. McClain1, Silvia Secchi2, Carl Bruch3, and Jonathan W. F. Remo1,4 Shanna N. McClain et al.
  • 1Environmental Resources and Policy, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA
  • 2Department of Geographical and Sustainability Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
  • 3Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC, USA
  • 4Department of Geography and Environmental Resources, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA

Abstract. This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to natural and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin, two transnational basins. Monitoring and response to these types of incidents have historically been managed separately. We discuss whether the policy distinctions in response to natural and man-made disasters remain functional given recent international trends toward holistic response to both kinds of disasters. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed, illustrate some of the specific gaps in the Danube and the Tisza, and conclude by proposing an integrated framework for disaster response in the Danube basin and Tisza sub-basin.

Download & links
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to natural and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin, two transnational basins. Monitoring and response to these types of incidents have historically been managed separately. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed, illustrate some of the specific gaps in the Danube and the Tisza, and propose an integrated framework.
This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to...
Citation
Share