Conceptualizing community resilience to natural hazards – the emBRACE framework

Kruse, Sylvia; Abeling, Thomas; Deeming, Hugh; Fordham, Maureen; Forrester, John; Jülich, Sebastian; Karanci, A. Nuray; Kuhlicke, Christian; Pelling, Mark; Pedoth, Lydia; Schneiderbauer, Stefan

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2321-2017

Articles | Volume 17, issue 12

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2321-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2321-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 17, issue 12

Research article

|

19 Dec 2017

Research article |

| 19 Dec 2017

Conceptualizing community resilience to natural hazards – the emBRACE framework

Sylvia Kruse, Thomas Abeling, Hugh Deeming, Maureen Fordham, John Forrester, Sebastian Jülich, A. Nuray Karanci, Christian Kuhlicke, Mark Pelling, Lydia Pedoth, and Stefan Schneiderbauer

Download

Final revised paper (published on 19 Dec 2017)
Preprint (discussion started on 04 May 2017)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review of nhess-2017-156', Ilan Kelman, 19 May 2017
RC2: 'Comments', Christiane Stephan, 28 Jun 2017
RC3: 'Comment', Hartmut Fünfgeld, 30 Jun 2017
AC1: 'Answer to the reviewers', Sylvia Kruse, 10 Aug 2017

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by Editor and Referees) (16 Aug 2017) by Sven Fuchs

AR by Sylvia Kruse on behalf of the Authors (31 Oct 2017) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (01 Nov 2017) by Sven Fuchs

Short summary

The emBRACE framework of community resilience conceptualizes resilience across three core domains: resources and capacities, actions, and learning. These are influenced by extra community forces, i.e. risk governance, societal context, disturbances and system change over time. It was developed by building on existing scholarly debates, on empirical case study work in five countries and on participatory consultation with community stakeholders where the framework was applied and ground-tested.