Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.281 IF 2.281
  • IF 5-year value: 2.693 IF 5-year 2.693
  • CiteScore value: 2.43 CiteScore 2.43
  • SNIP value: 1.193 SNIP 1.193
  • SJR value: 0.965 SJR 0.965
  • IPP value: 2.31 IPP 2.31
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 73 Scimago H index 73
Volume 17, issue 12 | Copyright
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2321-2333, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2321-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 19 Dec 2017

Research article | 19 Dec 2017

Conceptualizing community resilience to natural hazards – the emBRACE framework

Sylvia Kruse et al.
Related authors
Social capacities for drought risk management in Switzerland
S. Kruse and I. Seidl
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 3429-3441, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3429-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3429-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Estimating network related risks: A methodology and an application in the transport sector
Jürgen Hackl, Juan Carlos Lam, Magnus Heitzler, Bryan T. Adey, and Lorenz Hurni
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2273-2293, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2273-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2273-2018, 2018
From tsunami risk assessment to disaster risk reduction – the case of Oman
Ignacio Aguirre-Ayerbe, Jara Martínez Sánchez, Íñigo Aniel-Quiroga, Pino González-Riancho, María Merino, Sultan Al-Yahyai, Mauricio González, and Raúl Medina
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2241-2260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2241-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2241-2018, 2018
Upgrading of an index-oriented methodology for consequence analysis of natural hazards: application to the Upper Guil catchment (southern French Alps)
Benoît Carlier, Anne Puissant, Constance Dujarric, and Gilles Arnaud-Fassetta
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2221-2239, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2221-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2221-2018, 2018
Understanding epistemic uncertainty in large-scale coastal flood risk assessment for present and future climates
Michalis I. Vousdoukas, Dimitrios Bouziotas, Alessio Giardino, Laurens M. Bouwer, Lorenzo Mentaschi, Evangelos Voukouvalas, and Luc Feyen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2127-2142, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2127-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2127-2018, 2018
Development of fragility curves for road bridges exposed to volcanic lahars
Joaquín Dagá, Alondra Chamorro, Hernán de Solminihac, and Tomás Echaveguren
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2111-2125, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2111-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2111-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Abeling, T.: According to plan?: Disaster risk knowledge and organizational responses to heat wave risk in London, UK, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 1, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1890/EHS14-0022.1, 2015a.
Abeling, T.: Can we learn to be resilient? Institutional constraints for social learning in heatwave risk management in London, UK, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, King's College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 2015b.
Abeling, T., Huq, N., Chang-Seng, D., Birkmann, J., Wolfertz, J., Renaud, F., and Garschagen, M.: Understanding community disaster resilience, in: Framing Community Disaster Resilience: resources, capacities, learning and action, edited by: Deeming, H., Fordham, M., Kuhlicke, C., Pedoth, L., Schneiderbauer, S., and Shreve, C., Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom, in press, 2018.
Alexander, D.: Towards the development of a standard in emergency planning, Disaster Prev. Manag., 14, 158–175, https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560510595164, 2005.
Alexander, D. E.: Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2707–2716, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013, 2013.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The emBRACE framework of community resilience conceptualizes resilience across three core domains: resources and capacities, actions, and learning. These are influenced by extra community forces, i.e. risk governance, societal context, disturbances and system change over time. It was developed by building on existing scholarly debates, on empirical case study work in five countries and on participatory consultation with community stakeholders where the framework was applied and ground-tested.
The emBRACE framework of community resilience conceptualizes resilience across three core...
Citation
Share