All three reviewers agree that the work presented in this paper is important. The authors answered the vast majority of the reviewers’ comments. I therefore invite the authors to submit a revised document considering the referee’s comments.
The authors should consider carefully the questions raised by the referees on the completeness of the seismic catalogue. Referees 1 and 3 made pointed out some corrections needed in the figures. The authors should include them in the revised manuscript. Please note that when the authors answer Referee 2 and say: “However, majority of the literature agrees that the slip rate increases from north to south along the subduction line” the revised manuscript should include references that support this sentence.