Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.883 IF 2.883
  • IF 5-year value: 3.321 IF 5-year
    3.321
  • CiteScore value: 3.07 CiteScore
    3.07
  • SNIP value: 1.336 SNIP 1.336
  • IPP value: 2.80 IPP 2.80
  • SJR value: 1.024 SJR 1.024
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 81 Scimago H
    index 81
  • h5-index value: 43 h5-index 43
NHESS | Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1723–1735, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1723-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Advances in computational modelling of natural hazards and...

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1723–1735, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1723-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 12 Aug 2019

Research article | 12 Aug 2019

Evaluating the impact of model complexity on flood wave propagation and inundation extent with a hydrologic–hydrodynamic model coupling framework

Jannis M. Hoch et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
744 239 10 993 62 20 21
  • HTML: 744
  • PDF: 239
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 993
  • Supplement: 62
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Mar 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Mar 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 688 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 670 with geography defined and 18 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 15 Nov 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Flood events are often complex in their origin and dynamics. The choice of computer model to simulate can hence determine which level of complexity can be represented. We here compare different models varying in complexity (hydrology with routing, 1-D routing, 1D/2D hydrodynamics) and assess how model choice influences the accuracy of results. This was achieved by using GLOFRIM, a model coupling framework. Results show that accuracy depends on the model choice and the output variable considered.
Flood events are often complex in their origin and dynamics. The choice of computer model to...
Citation