Dear Authors,
Your paper has been revised by two reviewers. They raised several critical issues that need to be fixed before the publication. You provided a detailed feedback during the NHESS open discussion. I think you should have a chance to propose a revised version of your work. My recommendation is to accept this paper after major changes.
In submitting your revised version, please provide a detailed list of the changes made to the text and a detailed list of your responses to the reviewers’ comments.
Please note that this editorial decision does not guarantee that your paper will be accepted for final publication in NHESS. Because of the critical issues found, a decision will be made when the revised version will be available and will be evaluated with the help of the same, or further reviewers.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli

Dear authors,
You provided a suitable reply to all the comments raised by the reviewers. At this point, the article should be ready for publication. I would, therefore, suggest checking two minor issues (very easy to address):
(1) Discussion and Conclusion are merged. I would recommend to separate these, leaving one short chapter (chapter. 5) to the conclusion.
(2) Figure 6: is there a legend to add showing the colour ranges?
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli

Dear Authors,
I'm glad to accept your interesting article.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli
NHESS Executive Editor