Articles | Volume 19, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2249-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2249-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
11 Oct 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 11 Oct 2019

Geologic and geomorphic controls on rockfall hazard: how well do past rockfalls predict future distributions?

Josh Borella, Mark Quigley, Zoe Krauss, Krystina Lincoln, Januka Attanayake, Laura Stamp, Henry Lanman, Stephanie Levine, Sam Hampton, and Darren Gravley

Viewed

Total article views: 3,811 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,815 920 76 3,811 258 54 61
  • HTML: 2,815
  • PDF: 920
  • XML: 76
  • Total: 3,811
  • Supplement: 258
  • BibTeX: 54
  • EndNote: 61
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jun 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,811 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,086 with geography defined and 725 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Here we evaluate geologic, geomorphic, and anthropogenic controls on rockfall hazard and highlight the complexity of interpreting future rockfall hazard based on former boulder distributions. To evaluate how past rockfall deposits relate to contemporary rockfall hazard, we mapped then compared the locations, physical characteristics, and lithologies of rockfall boulders deposited during the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence (n = 185) with their prehistoric counterparts (n = 1093).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint