Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020
Brief communication
 | 
20 May 2020
Brief communication |  | 20 May 2020

Brief communication: Comparing hydrological and hydrogeomorphic paradigms for global flood hazard mapping

Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Fernando Nardi, Antonio Annis, Vincent Odongo, Maria Rusca, and Salvatore Grimaldi

Viewed

Total article views: 4,086 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,100 934 52 4,086 53 56
  • HTML: 3,100
  • PDF: 934
  • XML: 52
  • Total: 4,086
  • BibTeX: 53
  • EndNote: 56
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,086 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,682 with geography defined and 404 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Apr 2024
Short summary
Global floodplain mapping has rapidly progressed over the past few years. Different methods have been proposed to identify areas prone to river flooding, resulting in a plethora of available products. Here we assess the potential and limitations of two main paradigms and provide guidance on the use of these global products in assessing flood risk in data-poor regions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint