Articles | Volume 20, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-505-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-505-2020
Research article
 | 
21 Feb 2020
Research article |  | 21 Feb 2020

Back calculation of the 2017 Piz Cengalo–Bondo landslide cascade with r.avaflow: what we can do and what we can learn

Martin Mergili, Michel Jaboyedoff, José Pullarello, and Shiva P. Pudasaini

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (07 Nov 2019) by Margreth Keiler
AR by Anna Mirena Feist-Polner on behalf of the Authors (18 Nov 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Nov 2019) by Margreth Keiler
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (10 Dec 2019)
RR by Brian McArdell (13 Dec 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (15 Dec 2019) by Margreth Keiler
AR by Martin Mergili on behalf of the Authors (20 Dec 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (16 Jan 2020) by Margreth Keiler
Download
Short summary
Computer simulations of complex landslide processes in mountain areas are important for informing risk management but are at the same time challenging in terms of parameterization and physical and numerical model implementation. Using the tool r.avaflow, we highlight the progress and the challenges with regard to such simulations on the example of the Piz Cengalo–Bondo landslide cascade in Switzerland, which started as an initial rockslide–rockfall and finally evolved into a debris flow.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint